Why I Don’t Trust Lady Gaga

Since Lady Gaga began world domination in 2008, celebrities have claimed that they can, in fact, read Gaga’s p-p-poker face–they’ve seen the same one before.

Former Studio 54 icon Grace Jones told the press that Gaga had co-opted her signature style. M.I.A. called Gaga “a good mimic.” Bette Midler Tweeted that Gaga had copied her “mermaid in a wheelchair” bit, and Madonna’s brother complained that Gaga’s “Born This Way” was just a rip-off of his sister’s 1989 hit “Express Yourself.”

According to Kelly Osborne, Gaga’s drag performance at last weekend’s MTV Video Music Awards wasn’t exactly original either.

“I love lady gaga but I wish she would start giving credit where credit is due!” Osbourne wrote on Twitter, linking a YouTube video of Annie Lennox performing at the 1984 Grammy awards in drag.


But if Gaga’s potty-mouthed, chain-smoking male alter-ego “Jo Calderone” vaguely resembles Lennox’s drag persona (who vaguely resembles a lot of other male archetypes), then it seems that Lady Gaga is doing exactly what pop stars have have done since the beginning of popstardom–she’s borrowing from what’s hot and edgy. And right now, genderbending is even sexier than it was back in 1984.

This past June, NPR warned the world that “the end of gender” is near, citing everything from increasing number of gender-neutral prom courts to a controversial J. Crew ad to suggest that perhaps Americans aren’t so hung up on the male/female gender system anymore. Then, of course, there’s Marc Jacobs modeling kilts and womenswear, transgender model Andrej Pejic making FHM’s list of the 100 Sexiest Women, and the rise of androgynous hipster fashion.

Gaga seized the cultural shift and gobbled it down. But despite her widely-critiqued aptitude for appropriation, Gaga isn’t the only copycat. Let’s not forget that Madonna borrowed from Marilyn Monroe and May West. Madonna was also into adopting images from black and gay culture, and got some serious flack for her “Vogue” video.

But Gaga’s attempt to simultaneously steal from and market to a specific community is far more aggressive. Just look at the lyrics of “Born This Way:”

No matter gay, straight, or bi,
lesbian, transgendered life,
I’m on the right track baby,
I was born to survive.

“Typically, gay anthems have been chosen by gay people, not for gay people. The explicitly pro-gay sentiment is something relatively new to major-label pop,” explained Rich Juzwiak, author of the pop-culture FourFour blog. “I have mixed feelings about the conflation of activism and marketing inherent in a piece of commerce like ‘Born This Way,’ but ultimately, I think Gaga’s heart is in the right place. It’s pretty bold of her, while at the same time being utterly beneficial to her career and exposure.”

But while Gaga’s use of queer language and aesthetics has clearly benefited her rise to fame, what does that mean for folks whose lives/stories/iconography Gaga is appropriating?

Murray Hill

Murray Hill, a popular drag-king and the host of “Mr. Transman, responded positively to Gaga’s drag performance at the VMAs. “There is barely any visibility for FTM, drag kings and lesbians on television. There is a huge imbalance,” he said. “For Lady Gaga, the biggest pop star in the world, to go on TV with millions of people watching in drag as a man and then to actually say ‘lesbian and transgender’ live is undeniably powerful and creates change. She ups the visibility big time and gets the language into the mainstream.”

But why should Gaga, a woman who is not gay or transgender herself (or intersex, despite rumors about about what might be between her legs), have the privilege of getting that language into the mainstream? And should the queer community trust that she’ll get it right?

Honestly, I wouldn’t even trust the Queen of Pop with my BeDazzler.

To my queer ears, “Born This Way” sounds like an anthem promoting biological determinism, which totally denies that queer folks can (and do) choose their own identities. Her “Telephone” music video is full of images that glamorize the struggles of gender-variant people in prison. And the uproar that Gaga caused by using the men’s bathroom at the VMAs (as Jo Calderone) has little to do with the real violence that transgender people face in gender-specific spaces every day.

Lady Gaga is not a champion for the underdog. Lady Gaga isn’t even a real person. Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta created Gaga as a brand built on whatever trends the world has to offer.

You May Also Like:

Back to blog


5 Responses to “Why I Don’t Trust Lady Gaga”

  1. Well written! This piece expresses my very sentiments about Lady Gaga too. I’m glad I’m not alone in not trusting her.

    Posted by JT | September 6, 2011, 11:50 am
  2. Hi Malic, just jumping in on the discussion…you say “But why should Gaga, a woman who is not gay or transgender herself…have the privilege of getting that language into the mainstream? And should the queer community trust that she’ll get it right?” If you think of topics like racism, ableism, sexual assault, and anything where there are advocates for another group (that one may not belong to), you’ll see that ‘help/a voice/power in one’s position’ is accepted in many cases. If whites didn’t speak out against racism, men speaking out against rape (by 99% of men) etc. etc. where would we be? Aside from the fact that she identifies as Bi, I’d accept her support and her increasing awareness either way.

    I think she’s just a performer who did a drag act. I think if we attack her for doing drag then we need to attack everyone in our community doing drag right now who isn’t being politically responsible by acknowledging the trans community and it’s struggles (and I think that may be a bit much, not to mention we’d have a ton of work to do). Female and male impersonation ‘is what it is’ in the performance world, it’s drag. If we relate it all to trans issues, aren’t we then doing exactly what we shouldn’t be doing by putting trans and drag on the same level? While gender play just toys with the constructs, it opens doors for the mainstream community to expand their definitions of gender…I see that GaGa is in a position where she can be socially responsible and say/do so much more, but is that her job? I think that’s a big responsibility for art to have. I think creating these conversations between us is enough. What she is doing is working…Just my 2 cents…

    Posted by Candice | September 6, 2011, 12:27 pm
  3. Thank you Candice, for responding with the exact thoughts that went though my head when I read that quoted phrase.

    By saying GaGa isn’t part of the gay community, Malic is, in effect, denying bisexuality as a queer orientation. If you read what the bisexual community has to say about her, you’ll see they are thrilled to be included in the song, ‘Born This Way’.

    I think GaGa has actual, real, impressive talent as a singer and performer. If she didn’t, no one would care what she had to say about any political topic. The fact that she decided to speak out and be ‘in your face’ about queer issues could have progressed her career or hindered it. Her talent pushed her to the forefront and made it so the world couldn’t ignore her. It’s not only the gay community buying her records and sending her to platinum status. Her audience is wide, and that gives her voice power. She uses that voice to advocate for a wide variety of LGBTQ issues, and she does it in a way that garners even more attention than her pop star status would otherwise.

    People had nothing but positive things to say about Christina Agulera when she made the video for ‘Beautiful’. Is it because it was more tasteful and subtle than what GaGa does?

    I wanted to dislike Lady Gaga when her first single came out… and I just couldn’t. I agree that, “While gender play just toys with the constructs, it opens doors for the mainstream community to expand their definitions of gender…” Young people are watching her, and she’s telling them that rigid definitions of anything regarding the human construct is silliness.

    At the end of the day, I agree that what she’s doing is working.

    Posted by Amy | September 6, 2011, 5:12 pm
  4. What a fantastic and thought provoking conversation. Love it.

    Posted by Joy | November 23, 2011, 2:27 pm
  5. I agree with Candice and Amy on this one. I would also like to add that being “born this way” in the Gaga sense, was never meant to be about ‘biological determinism.’ Gaga says that the message is about how we are not necessarily “born in a single moment,” but should be free to be “reborn” over and over again until we have achieved the image or feeling of identity that we feel we should have. So, in fact, the message of born this way actually reinforces that LGBT choose their identities.

    Posted by Chelsoir | May 16, 2012, 10:48 am

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.